From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay2-v.mail.gandi.net (relay2-v.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.76]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABC3B7CE6 for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:30:22 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:30:12 -0700 From: Josh Triplett To: Albrecht =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dre=DF?= Subject: Re: Failing to get DMA working with MPC5200 (TQM5200) and CompactFlash Message-ID: <20100329213012.GB23497@feather> References: <20100317051521.GA16826@feather> <20100326213202.GD5350@feather> <20100326221707.GA1953@leila.ping.de> <20100326225916.GA5690@feather> <1269696136.2245.1@antares> <20100328222441.GC16396@feather> <1269888128.2995.0@antares> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <1269888128.2995.0@antares> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 08:42:08PM +0200, Albrecht Dreß wrote: > Am 29.03.10 00:24 schrieb(en) Josh Triplett: > >We have the MPC5200C rev of the board, not the MPC5200B rev which > > Ummm - I didn't know that there is a 5200C available. The Freescale web site only mentions the 5200 and the 5200B. Do you have any pointers to data sheets/docs? I don't know the details; just repeating what the hardware team told me. :) We may have the revisions and suffixes mixed up, or we may have run into some terminology difference between the TQM5200 and the MPC5200. - Josh Triplett