linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] hvc_console: Fix race between hvc_close and hvc_remove
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 21:42:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100406114238.GN5594@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100326124340.GB7039@amit-x200.redhat.com>


Hi,

> > Looking at the commit e74d098c66543d0731de62eb747ccd5b636a6f4c,
> > i see that for every tty_kref_get() there is a corresponding
> > tty_kref_put() except maybe for the one in the following patch snippet
> >
> >        spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
> >        /* Check and then increment for fast path open. */
> >        if (hp->count++ > 0) {
> > +               tty_kref_get(tty);
> >                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
> >                hvc_kick();
> >                return 0;
> >
> > I don't know this code very well but we might be missing a
> > corresponding tty_kref_put() some place ?
> 
> See hvc_hangup:
> 
> 	temp_open_count = hp->count;
> 	...
> 	while(temp_open_count) {
> 		--temp_open_count;
> 		tty_kref_put(tty);
> 		kref_put(&hp->kref, destroy_hvc_struct);
> 	}

I don't claim to understand the tty layer, but it seems like hvc_open and
hvc_close should be balanced in their kref reference counting.

Right now we get a kref every call to hvc_open:

        if (hp->count++ > 0) {
                tty_kref_get(tty); <----- here
                spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
                hvc_kick();
                return 0;
        } /* else count == 0 */

        tty->driver_data = hp;

        hp->tty = tty_kref_get(tty); <------ or here if hp->count was 0

But hvc_close has:

        tty_kref_get(tty);

        if (--hp->count == 0) {
...
                /* Put the ref obtained in hvc_open() */
                tty_kref_put(tty);
...
        }

        tty_kref_put(tty);

Since the outside kref get/put balance we only do a single kref_put when
count reaches 0.

The patch below changes things to call tty_kref_put once for every
hvc_close call, and with that my machine boots fine.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---

diff --git a/drivers/char/hvc_console.c b/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
index d3890e8..35cca4c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hvc_console.c
@@ -368,16 +368,12 @@ static void hvc_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file * filp)
 	hp = tty->driver_data;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&hp->lock, flags);
-	tty_kref_get(tty);
 
 	if (--hp->count == 0) {
 		/* We are done with the tty pointer now. */
 		hp->tty = NULL;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hp->lock, flags);
 
-		/* Put the ref obtained in hvc_open() */
-		tty_kref_put(tty);
-
 		if (hp->ops->notifier_del)
 			hp->ops->notifier_del(hp, hp->data);
 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-06 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20100319151326.GC8541@kroah.com>
2010-03-19 15:18 ` [PATCH 4/7] hvc_console: Fix race between hvc_close and hvc_remove Greg Kroah-Hartman
2010-03-20 21:04   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-21  4:37     ` Amit Shah
2010-03-24 12:19       ` Amit Shah
2010-03-25 23:30         ` Anton Blanchard
2010-03-26  2:01           ` Amit Shah
2010-03-26  9:13         ` Sachin Sant
2010-03-26  9:58           ` Amit Shah
2010-03-26 10:54             ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-03-26 11:42             ` Sachin Sant
2010-03-26 11:52               ` Alan Cox
2010-03-26 12:49                 ` Amit Shah
2010-03-26 12:43               ` Amit Shah
2010-04-06 11:42                 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2010-04-06 12:09                   ` Amit Shah
2010-04-06 12:27                   ` Sachin Sant
2010-04-06 12:32                   ` Alan Cox
2010-04-08  0:26                   ` Rusty Russell
2010-03-24 10:45     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-03-24 10:57       ` Amit Shah
2010-03-24 11:37     ` Alan Cox
2010-03-24 15:05       ` Amit Shah

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100406114238.GN5594@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).