From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD70AB7D16 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:36:17 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 22:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20100421.223620.257172362.davem@davemloft.net> To: tklein@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][RESEND] ehea: error handling improvement From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <201004211110.55986.tklein@de.ibm.com> References: <201004211110.55986.tklein@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, themann@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Klein Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:10:55 +0200 > Reset a port's resources only if they're actually in an error state > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein > --- > > Patch created against net-2.6 I thought you were sorry for wasting my time and that you were going to follow the directions I gave you last time, and I quote: -------------------- 3) These are not appropriate for net-2.6 as we are deep in the -rcX series at this point and only the most diabolical bug fixes are appropriate. Therefore, please generate these against net-next-2.6, thanks. -------------------- And here you are generating your patches against net-2.6. Heck, you even feel it's worth mentioning explicitly. Lucky for you the patches happen to apply cleanly to net-next-2.6 so I've put them there.