From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wy0-f170.google.com (mail-wy0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99D6B7D64 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 05:29:55 +1000 (EST) Received: by wyf28 with SMTP id 28so3150575wyf.15 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 23:29:47 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: MPC8313: fsl_elbc_nand and MDR Message-ID: <20100426192947.GA25762@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <335466.44978.qm@web83505.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <4BD5E940.7000109@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <4BD5E940.7000109@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ron Madrid List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 02:28:00PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > Ron Madrid wrote: > >Thanks. Although this doesn't handle programming the > >UPM, which is where my conflict is occurring. MDR is > >used when programming the UPM. Do you think I would > >be better served to program the UPM in U-boot and > >therefore preempt this conflict? > > If you don't need to reprogram it dynamically, doing it either in > u-boot or early in platform code is probably best. > > I guess the UPM NAND code relies on U-Boot doing this? Yep, u-boot or platform code. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2