From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DE9B7D59 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:41:28 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 09:41:21 +0200 From: Anatolij Gustschin To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Rework MPC5121 DIU support (for 2.6.35) Message-ID: <20100430094121.6618234d@wker> In-Reply-To: References: <1272584978-19063-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, wd@denx.de, dzu@denx.de, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, yorksun@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 20:39:02 -0500 Timur Tabi wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > This patch series rework DIU support patches submitted > > previously. Comments to the previos patch series have > > been addressed, not related changes are dropped and some > > changes are split out to separate patches to simplify > > review. Furthermore a patch has been added to support > > setting display mode using EDID block in the device tree. > > Have you tested these changes on an MPC8610 HPCD? If not, do you > think your changes will break that platform? I've compile tested these changes using 86xx/mpc8610_hpcd_defconfig. Unfortunately I don't have an MPC8610 HPCD and can not test it more, but I don't think these patches will break that platform. Anatolij