linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, mikey@neuling.org, miltonm@bga.com,
	michael@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: kdump: Use chip->shutdown to disable IRQs
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:27:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100511022738.GG12203@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100511022551.GF12203@kryten>


I saw this in a kdump kernel:

IOMMU table initialized, virtual merging enabled
Interrupt 155954 (real) is invalid, disabling it.
Interrupt 155953 (real) is invalid, disabling it.

ie we took some spurious interrupts. default_machine_crash_shutdown tries
to disable all interrupt sources but uses chip->disable which maps to
the default action of:

static void default_disable(unsigned int irq)
{
}

If we use chip->shutdown, then we actually mask the IRQ:

static void default_shutdown(unsigned int irq)
{
        struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);

        desc->chip->mask(irq);
        desc->status |= IRQ_MASKED;
}

Not sure why we don't implement a ->disable action for xics.c, or why
default_disable doesn't mask the interrupt.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---

Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c	2010-05-10 23:43:10.445953883 +1000
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c	2010-05-10 23:43:21.223454012 +1000
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void default_machine_crash_shutdown(stru
 			desc->chip->eoi(i);
 
 		if (!(desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED))
-			desc->chip->disable(i);
+			desc->chip->shutdown(i);
 	}
 
 	/*

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-11  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-11  2:23 [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: kdump: Fix NULL pointer dereference in irq disable code Anton Blanchard
2010-05-11  2:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: kdump: CPUs assume the context of the oopsing CPU Anton Blanchard
2010-05-11  2:27   ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2010-05-11  4:11     ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: kdump: Use chip->shutdown to disable IRQs Michael Ellerman
2010-05-11  4:14   ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: kdump: CPUs assume the context of the oopsing CPU Michael Ellerman
2010-05-11  4:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: kdump: Fix NULL pointer dereference in irq disable code Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100511022738.GG12203@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=miltonm@bga.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).