Re: [PATCH] drivers: remove all i2c_set_clientdata(client, NULL)

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:48:32PM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 12:09 -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > I2C-drivers can use the clientdata-pointer to point to private data. As I2C
> > > devices are not really unregistered, but merely detached from their driver, it
> > > used to be the drivers obligation to clear this pointer during remove() or a
> > > failed probe(). As a couple of drivers forgot to do this, it was agreed that it
> > > was cleaner if the i2c-core does this clearance when appropriate, as there is
> > > no guarantee for the lifetime of the clientdata-pointer after remove() anyhow.
> > > This feature was added to the core with commit
> > > e4a7b9b04de15f6b63da5ccdd373ffa3057a3681 to fix the faulty drivers.
> > > 
> > > As there is no need anymore to clear the clientdata-pointer, remove all current
> > > occurrences in the drivers to simplify the code and prevent confusion.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Some more notes:
> > > 
> > > I waited for rc1 as I knew there were some drivers/patches coming along which
> > > needed to be processed, too.
> > > 
> > > I'd suggest that this goes via the i2c-tree, so we get rid of all occurences at
> > > once.
> > > 
> > 
> > Frankly I'd prefer taking input stuff through my tree with the goal of
> > .36 merge window just to minimize potential merge issues. This is a
> > simple cleanup patch that has no dependencies, so there is little gain
> > from doing it all in one go.
> 
> How about asking Linus to take this one now, then its done and we can
> all move on rather than queuing up problems for the next merge window?
> 

That should work.

Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>

> Acked-by: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@linux.intel.com>
> 

-- 
Dmitry