From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (mail.lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D927B7D81 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:15:57 +1000 (EST) Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 17:15:54 -0500 From: Olof Johansson To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: Request review of device tree documentation Message-ID: <20100612221554.GA17876@lixom.net> References: <33BD8E86-9397-432A-97BF-F154812C157B@digitaldans.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, devicetree-discuss , linuxppc-dev , Mitch Bradley , Dan Malek , Jeremy Kerr List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:53:59AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > I also changed the property in the cpu nodes from model to compatible > so that the exact CPU version can be specified. This isn't actually > in any spec anywhere, but I need something to properly identify the > different ARM cores. I don't see why this has to be in the device tree. It's not there on PPC. The exact CPU version is found through the PVR register on PPC, ARM also has cpu version and feature registers for runtime probing. -Olof