From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Shawn Jin <shawnxjin@gmail.com>
Cc: ppcdev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: machine check in kernel for a mpc870 board
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 14:41:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100702144110.4a7ebd1d@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimX7G59glJ9CQZpT-Zlb3EUsJ1Lil4_80BOi1Nk@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 12:16:11 -0700
Shawn Jin <shawnxjin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The chipselect? Isn't it just the child-bus-addr? BTW, do we have
> >> to define the #address-cells to 2? 1 is not enough?
> >
> > The first cell of the child bus address is the chip select, the
> > second cell is the offset into the chip select.
>=20
> I see. So the #address-sells of 2 doesn't necessarily indicate the
> address is 64 bits?
Well, there's 64 bits of data, but it doesn't mean that it's one 64-bit
integer.
> Different processors can interpret it differently?
Different device tree bus types can -- though in this case it translates
to an ordinary CPU address using the standand ranges property.
> Where can I find such info? Is there any doc on this?
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/lbc.txt
> I have a question on the serial settings. Why does it locate at 0xa80?
> According to MPC885RM.pdf, the SMC1's registers start from 0xa82.=20
I suppose the interpretation was that the register block starts at
0xa80, and the first register within that block is at 0xa82 -- though
the manual seems to actually lump those two reserved bytes in with the
previous section.
> What does the reg property specify here for SMC1, the first set of <0xa80
> 0x10> and the 2nd <0x3e80 0x40>?
=46rom Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/cpm.txt:
> - reg : Unless otherwise specified, the first resource represents the =20
> scc/fcc/ucc registers, and the second represents the device's
> parameter RAM region (if it has one).
-Scott
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-02 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-29 7:59 machine check in kernel for a mpc870 board Shawn Jin
2010-06-29 8:06 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2010-06-29 8:37 ` Shawn Jin
2010-06-29 18:56 ` Scott Wood
2010-06-30 6:14 ` Shawn Jin
2010-06-30 16:16 ` Scott Wood
2010-06-30 22:25 ` Shawn Jin
2010-07-01 7:50 ` Shawn Jin
2010-07-01 17:42 ` Scott Wood
2010-07-01 20:17 ` Shawn Jin
2010-07-01 20:25 ` Scott Wood
2010-07-02 17:06 ` Shawn Jin
2010-07-02 17:47 ` Scott Wood
2010-07-02 19:16 ` Shawn Jin
2010-07-02 19:41 ` Scott Wood [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100702144110.4a7ebd1d@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=shawnxjin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).