From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mikpe@it.uu.se
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] math-emu: correct test for downshifting fraction in _FP_FROM_INT()
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:12:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100719.151233.215575238.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19524.51858.992299.119315@pilspetsen.it.uu.se>
From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 23:58:42 +0200
> The kernel's math-emu code contains a macro _FP_FROM_INT() which is
> used to convert an integer to a raw normalized floating-point value.
> It does this basically in three steps:
>
> 1. Compute the exponent from the number of leading zero bits.
> 2. Downshift large fractions to put the MSB in the right position
> for normalized fractions.
> 3. Upshift small fractions to put the MSB in the right position.
>
> There is an boundary error in step 2, causing a fraction with its
> MSB exactly one bit above the normalized MSB position to not be
> downshifted. This results in a non-normalized raw float, which when
> packed becomes a massively inaccurate representation for that input.
>
> The impact of this depends on a number of arch-specific factors,
> but it is known to have broken emulation of FXTOD instructions
> on UltraSPARC III, which was originally reported as GCC bug 44631
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44631>.
>
> Any arch which uses math-emu to emulate conversions from integers to
> same-size floats may be affected.
>
> The fix is simple: the exponent comparison used to determine if the
> fraction should be downshifted must be "<=" not "<".
>
> I'm sending a kernel module to test this as a reply to this message.
> There are also SPARC user-space test cases in the GCC bug entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Thanks for fixing this Mikael:
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Has anyone done an audit to compare the copy of math-emu in glibc, gcc,
and the linux kernel so that we don't have bugs living in some places
but not others?
These sources really need to be consolidated somehow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-19 21:58 [PATCH] math-emu: correct test for downshifting fraction in _FP_FROM_INT() Mikael Pettersson
2010-07-19 22:12 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-07-20 7:34 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2010-07-19 22:12 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-07-20 13:35 ` Mikael Pettersson
2010-07-21 1:45 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100719.151233.215575238.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).