From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.suse.de (cantor.suse.de [195.135.220.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.suse.de", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAB3DB6F0E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:55:19 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 11:46:47 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] USB: add of_platform glue driver for FSL USB DR controller Message-ID: <20100728184647.GA7128@suse.de> References: <1279815922-27198-1-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <1279815922-27198-3-git-send-email-agust@denx.de> <20100728135858.5dc14484@wker> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: David Brownell , Wolfgang Denk , Detlev Zundel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Anatolij Gustschin List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:14:14PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > > Hi Grant, > > > > On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 02:16:08 -0600 > > Grant Likely wrote: > > > >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > >> > The driver creates platform devices based on the information > >> > from USB nodes in the flat device tree. This is the replacement > >> > for old arch fsl_soc usb code removed by the previous patch. > >> > It uses usual of-style binding, available EHCI-HCD and UDC > >> > drivers can be bound to the created devices. The new of-style > >> > driver additionaly instantiates USB OTG platform device, as the > >> > appropriate USB OTG driver will be added soon. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin > >> > Cc: Kumar Gala > >> > Cc: Grant Likely > >> > >> Hi Anatolij, > >> > >> Looks pretty good, but some comments below. > > > > Thanks for review and comments! Greg already merged this series and > > therefore I'll submit an incremental cleanup patch to address > > outstanding issues. My reply is below. > > Greg maintains a patchwork tree IIRC. I believe he drops patches from > his linux-next branch if they need to be reworked. Greg, do I have > this right? Yup. I can easily drop all of these patches. > Also, my preference would be to see some 3rd party testing before > committing to having this merged. Ok, I will go drop them all now, and wait for some that pass your review. thanks, greg k-h