From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e32.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AEFCB70B8 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:45:22 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o79Kb00r026019 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:37:00 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (d03av06.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.245]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o79Kiwvx218732 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:45:04 -0600 Received: from d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av06.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o79KmM3r001305 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2010 14:48:23 -0600 From: Nishanth Aravamudan To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] v5 Update memory-hotplug documentation Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 13:44:37 -0700 References: <4C60407C.2080608@austin.ibm.com> <4C604C62.7060509@austin.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <4C604C62.7060509@austin.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <201008091344.37878.nacc@us.ibm.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday, August 09, 2010 11:43:46 am Nathan Fontenot wrote: > Update the memory hotplug documentation to reflect the new behaviors of > memory blocks reflected in sysfs. > Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt 2010-08-09 07:36:48.000000000 -0500 > +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/memory-hotplug.txt 2010-08-09 07:59:54.000000000 -0500 > -/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/phys_index > +/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/start_phys_index > +/sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/end_phys_index > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/phys_device > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/state > /sys/devices/system/memory/memoryXXX/removable > > -'phys_index' : read-only and contains section id, same as XXX. > +'phys_index' : read-only and contains section id of the first section Shouldn't this be "start_phys_index"? Thanks, Nish -- Nishanth Aravamudan Linux Technology Center