linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: grant.likely@secretlab.ca
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, afleming@freescale.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: ERR_PTR pattern in phylib
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:27:29 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100901.082729.135524471.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimjVZTNeLdm4qptU1MqREODLASdGGanUyxqxfub@mail.gmail.com>

From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 08:42:49 -0600

> It seems to me that phylib is one of the cases where the users (the
> network drivers) don't actually care about the specific error code
> when calling phylib functions.  The drivers only seem to care whether
> or not the function failed, and if it did then bail out.  I've also
> noticed that using the "if (!ptr)" test on phylib return values is a
> common error for driver writers.
> 
> In the interest of making driver code easier to write and review,
> would you be opposed to a set of patches to remove the ERR_PTR()
> pattern from phylib and its users?

I'm opposed to it because it means that if code actually does
care about the error code it will no longer be able to obtain
it.

Please don't make this change, thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-01 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-01 14:42 ERR_PTR pattern in phylib Grant Likely
2010-09-01 15:27 ` David Miller [this message]
2010-09-01 18:56   ` Grant Likely
2010-09-01 19:03     ` David Miller
2010-09-01 15:50 ` Fleming Andy-AFLEMING
2010-09-02 15:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2010-09-02 16:34   ` David Miller
2010-09-02 16:43     ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100901.082729.135524471.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).