From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:37:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100908213740.GA7550@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100907153813.936db0c6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 03:38:13PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I noticed no throughput drop neither with PIO transfers nor
> > with DMA (tested on MPC8569E CPU), while latencies should be
> > greatly improved.
>
> This patchset isn't causing any problems yet, but may do so in the
> future and will impact the validity of any testing. It seems to be
> kind of stuck. Should I drop it all?
I suggest keeping it -- I'll find time to test it out here soon, and
will keep it in mind as a possible regression cause.
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-08 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-14 13:07 [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/8] sdhci: Turn timeout timer into delayed work Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:07 ` [PATCH 2/8] sdhci: Use work structs instead of tasklets Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 3/8] sdhci: Clear interrupt status register just once Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 4/8] sdhci: Use threaded IRQ handler Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 5/8] sdhci: Turn host->lock into a mutex Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 6/8] sdhci: Get rid of card detect work Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 7/8] sdhci: Get rid of mdelay()s where it is safe and makes sense Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-14 13:08 ` [PATCH 8/8] sdhci: Use jiffies instead of a timeout counter Anton Vorontsov
2010-07-15 6:02 ` [PATCH 0/8] sdhci: Move real work out of an atomic context Matt Fleming
2010-07-21 21:13 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-07 22:38 ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-08 21:37 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2010-09-08 21:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-08 22:05 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-08 22:27 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-09-09 2:28 ` Chris Ball
2010-09-09 7:15 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100908213740.GA7550@void.printf.net \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=albert_herranz@yahoo.es \
--cc=avorontsov@mvista.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
--cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).