From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yow.seanm.ca (toronto-hs-216-138-233-67.s-ip.magma.ca [216.138.233.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A315CB70D2 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:10:02 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:09:54 -0400 From: Sean MacLennan To: Tirumala Marri Subject: Re: Combining defconfigs for 44x based boards Message-ID: <20100909130954.265adb37@lappy.seanm.ca> In-Reply-To: <56886bb653a2198b7a5bdcf5f38d4a98@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100909004853.GA11808@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <49073d172310031addb3aa7d08a60c99@mail.gmail.com> <20100909063601.03CCE1506AA@gemini.denx.de> <56886bb653a2198b7a5bdcf5f38d4a98@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Wolfgang Denk List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:49:14 -0700 Tirumala Marri wrote: > [Marri] Great we already have it. We should remove the defconfigs > under 44x then ? I'd rather we didn't. I thought Linus' beef was over the churn in the defconfigs, not the fact that they exist. The 44x defconfigs change very rarely. Cheers, Sean