* Question on of_address_to_resource() with offset != 0
@ 2010-09-14 14:29 Stefan Roese
2010-09-15 12:59 ` Stefan Roese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2010-09-14 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Detlev Zundel
Hi,
I'm stumbling upon a problem noticed on the Ebony (440GP) eval board.
Here the first chip-select is connected to 512KiB of SRAM and 512KiB
NOR flash. The dts part look this way:
small-flash@0,80000 {
compatible = "jedec-flash";
bank-width = <1>;
reg = <0x00000000 0x00080000 0x00080000>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
partition@0 {
label = "OpenBIOS";
reg = <0x00000000 0x00080000>;
read-only;
};
};
Chip-select 0 has this setup:
base-addr = 0xfff00000, size = 0x100000 (phys addr 0x1fff00000 .. 0x1ffffffff)
The problem/crash happens in the physmap_of driver, when the the driver
calls do_map_probe() with the following range:
base-addr = 0xfff80000, size = 0x100000 (phys addr 0x1fff80000 .. 0x20007ffff)
My question now is, should of_address_to_resource() subtract the
offset (here 0x80000) from the size? Is this is bug here? Or should
the physmap_of driver take care of this issue somehow?
Cheers,
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Question on of_address_to_resource() with offset != 0
2010-09-14 14:29 Question on of_address_to_resource() with offset != 0 Stefan Roese
@ 2010-09-15 12:59 ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-15 18:43 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Roese @ 2010-09-15 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: devicetree-discuss; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Detlev Zundel
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 16:29:06 Stefan Roese wrote:
> I'm stumbling upon a problem noticed on the Ebony (440GP) eval board.
> Here the first chip-select is connected to 512KiB of SRAM and 512KiB
> NOR flash.
"Brown paper bag" time for me. Problem was located in U-Boot. Sorry for the
noise.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question on of_address_to_resource() with offset != 0
2010-09-15 12:59 ` Stefan Roese
@ 2010-09-15 18:43 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2010-09-15 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Roese; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linuxppc-dev, Detlev Zundel
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 02:59:42PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 16:29:06 Stefan Roese wrote:
> > I'm stumbling upon a problem noticed on the Ebony (440GP) eval board.
> > Here the first chip-select is connected to 512KiB of SRAM and 512KiB
> > NOR flash.
>
> "Brown paper bag" time for me. Problem was located in U-Boot. Sorry for the
> noise.
:-)
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-09-15 18:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-09-14 14:29 Question on of_address_to_resource() with offset != 0 Stefan Roese
2010-09-15 12:59 ` Stefan Roese
2010-09-15 18:43 ` Grant Likely
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).