From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CABB70D1 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:58:32 +1000 (EST) From: Stefan Roese To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PPC4xx: Generelizing drivers/dma/ppc4xx/adma.c Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 08:58:04 +0200 References: <1284774145-14543-1-git-send-email-tmarri@apm.com> <4C9BB6EB.7020802@intel.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <201009240858.05018.sr@denx.de> Cc: herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, Tirumala Marri , yur@emcraft.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, neilb@suse.de, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 24 September 2010 00:39:47 Tirumala Marri wrote: > > Will both versions of this driver exist in the same kernel build? For > > example the iop-adma driver supports iop13xx and iop3xx, but we select > > the archtitecture at build time? Or, as I assume in this case, will > > the > > two (maybe more?) ppc4xx adma drivers all be built in the same image, > > more like ioatdma? > > [Marri] We select the architecture at build time. It would be really preferable to support all those platforms in a single Linux image. If technically possible, please try to move this direction. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan