From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Ayman El-Khashab <ayman@elkhashab.com>
Subject: Re: ppc44x - how do i optimize driver for tlb hits
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 06:30:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100924103034.GA27958@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285303432.14081.28.camel@pasglop>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:43:52PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> The DMA is what I use in the "real world case" to get data into and out
>> of these buffers. However, I can disable the DMA completely and do only
>> the kmalloc. In this case I still see the same poor performance. My
>> prefetching is part of my algo using the dcbt instructions. I know the
>> instructions are effective b/c without them the algo is much less
>> performant. So yes, my prefetches are explicit.
>
>Could be some "effect" of the cache structure, L2 cache, cache geometry
>(number of ways etc...). You might be able to alleviate that by changing
>the "stride" of your prefetch.
>
>Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the 440 micro architecture
>and its caches to be able to help you much here.
Also, doesn't kmalloc have a limit to the size of the request it will
let you allocate? I know in the distant past you could allocate 128K
with kmalloc, and 2M with an explicit call to get_free_pages. Anything
larger than that had to use vmalloc. The limit might indeed be higher
now, but a 4MB kmalloc buffer sounds very large, given that it would be
contiguous pages. Two of them even less so.
>> Ok, I will give that a try ... in addition, is there an easy way to use
>> any sort of gprof like tool to see the system performance? What about
>> looking at the 44x performance counters in some meaningful way? All
>> the experiments point to the fetching being slower in the full program
>> as opposed to the algo in a testbench, so I want to determine what it is
>> that could cause that.
>
>Does it have any useful performance counters ? I didn't think it did but
>I may be mistaken.
No, it doesn't.
josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-24 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-23 15:12 ppc44x - how do i optimize driver for tlb hits Ayman El-Khashab
2010-09-23 22:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-23 22:35 ` Ayman El-Khashab
2010-09-24 1:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-24 2:58 ` Ayman El-Khashab
2010-09-24 4:43 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-09-24 10:30 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2010-09-24 13:08 ` Ayman El-Khashab
2010-09-24 22:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2010-10-03 19:13 ` Ayman El-Khashab
2010-10-03 22:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100924103034.GA27958@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ayman@elkhashab.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).