linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:28:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100929192830.GK14068@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA2313D.2030508@austin.ibm.com>

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:17:33PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> On 09/28/2010 07:38 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > I was tasked with looking at a slowdown in similar sized SGI machines
> > booting x86_64.  Jack Steiner had already looked into the memory_dev_init.
> > I was looking at link_mem_sections().
> > 
> > I made a dramatic improvement on a 16TB machine in that function by
> > merely caching the most recent memory section and checking to see if
> > the next memory section happens to be the subsequent in the linked list
> > of kobjects.
> > 
> > That simple cache reduced the time for link_mem_sections from 1 hour 27
> > minutes down to 46 seconds.
> 
> Nice!
> 
> > 
> > I would like to propose we implement something along those lines also,
> > but I am currently swamped.  I can probably get you a patch tomorrow
> > afternoon that applies at the end of this set.
> 
> Should this be done as a separate patch?  This patch set concentrates on
> updates to the memory code with the node updates only being done due to the
> memory changes.
> 
> I think its a good idea to do the caching and have no problem adding on to
> this patchset if no one else has any objections.

I am sorry.  I had meant to include you on the Cc: list.  I just posted a
set of patches (3 small patches) which implement the cache most recent bit
I aluded to above.  Search for a subject of "Speed up link_mem_sections
during boot" and you will find them.  I did add you to the Cc: list for
the next time I end up sending the set.

My next task is to implement a x86_64 SGI UV specific chunk of code
to memory_block_size_bytes().  Would you consider adding that to your
patch set?  I expect to have that either later today or early tomorrow.

Robin

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-29 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-27 19:09 [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:21 ` [PATCH 1/8] v2 Move find_memory_block() routine Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:22 ` [PATCH 2/8] v2 Add section count to memory_block struct Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28  9:31   ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 18:14     ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] v2 Add mutex for adding/removing memory blocks Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/8] v2 Allow memory block to span multiple memory sections Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 23:55   ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-28 18:06     ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 12:48   ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 18:20     ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] v2 Add end_phys_index file Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:27 ` [PATCH 6/8] v2 Update node sysfs code Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28  9:29   ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 15:21     ` Dave Hansen
2010-09-27 19:28 ` [PATCH 7/8] v2 Define memory_block_size_bytes() for powerpc/pseries Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-27 19:28 ` [PATCH 8/8] v2 Update memory hotplug documentation Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 12:45   ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-28 18:18     ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-28 12:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections Robin Holt
2010-09-28 18:17   ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-29 19:28     ` Robin Holt [this message]
2010-09-30 15:17       ` Nathan Fontenot
2010-09-30 16:39       ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 12:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-28 15:12   ` Robin Holt
2010-09-28 16:34     ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-29  2:50     ` Greg KH
2010-09-29  8:32       ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-29 12:37         ` Greg KH
2010-09-29 13:39           ` Kay Sievers
2010-10-03  7:52           ` Avi Kivity
2010-09-28 15:17   ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100929192830.GK14068@sgi.com \
    --to=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).