From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from VA3EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (va3ehsobe003.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Cybertrust SureServer Standard Validation CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26F151007D3 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:50:22 +1100 (EST) Received: from mail192-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail192-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D014A8131 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from VA3EHSMHS030.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.244]) by mail192-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0819D17C804F for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from de01smr02.am.mot.com (de01smr02.freescale.net [10.208.0.151]) by de01egw02.freescale.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9EHoD89028498 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:50:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from az33exm25.fsl.freescale.net (az33exm25.am.freescale.net [10.64.32.16]) by de01smr02.am.mot.com (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id o9EI6RkF012757 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2010 13:06:27 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:50:10 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Subject: Re: Questions on interrupt vector assignment on MPC8641D Message-ID: <20101014125010.5cfb4ee5@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: References: <6e7b840fa55e4fba421e1b1cea2716ec.squirrel@localhost> <1682399277683944B902B3657D2FCE21654570D791@CAREXCLUSTER03.ATL.CW.LOCAL> <20100921170700.53a99e56@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <20101007152626.4e834d43@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <8636b70ea34330679bebdaad187ccd68.squirrel@localhost> <4CB2DEFB.90204@windriver.com> <20101011121745.2e471fc0@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <942ea2f3464025464521511c32355782.squirrel@localhost> <20101012162152.5246744a@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <4CB5088D.4090201@windriver.com> <20101013102815.2959fcb6@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <4CB65F6F.1090103@windriver.com> <4CB6788D.60705@windriver.com> <20101014105126.08da9dd7@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> <20101014113230.051b967a@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: "tiejun.chen" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:20:55 -0500 wrote: > > It comes from FRR[NIRQ]. It seems that this chip takes a > > less-than-useful interpretation of what that field means -- it gives > > the actual number of sources, not the size of the sparsely populated > > array. > Perhaps you might want to have a talk with your cow-orkers there, Scott, > since this is a Freescale part. Well, it was a coworker who added the workaround, so I assume we're already aware of the issue. The description of NIRQ is vague enough that it's hard to argue that Linux's expectations of what it means are justified. -Scott