LinuxPPC-Dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Lan Chunhe <b25806@freescale.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	dougthompson@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] of/device: Register children with a compatible value in of_platform_bus_probe()
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:50:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101230065045.GB843@angua.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291978340-15933-1-git-send-email-b25806@freescale.com>

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 06:52:20PM +0800, Lan Chunhe wrote:
> Currently, of_platform_bus_probe() completely skips nodes which do not
> explicitly match the 'matches' table passed in.  Or, if the root node
> matches, then it registers all the children unconditionally.  However,
> there are situations, such as registering devices from the root node,
> when it is desirable to register child nodes, but only if they actually
> represent devices.  For example, the root node may contain both a local
> bus and a PCI device, but it also contains the chosen, aliases and cpus
> nodes which don't represent real devices.
> 
> This patch changes of_platform_bus_probe() to register all nodes at the
> top level if they either match the matches table (the current behaviour),
> or if they have a 'compatible' value (indicating it represents a device).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lan Chunhe <b25806@freescale.com>

I believe this is my patch I wrote and pushed out to my tree back in
October.  Was this cherry-picked out of the test-devicetree branch?

> ---
>  drivers/of/platform.c |   28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
> index 5b4a07f..02755ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
> @@ -714,6 +714,8 @@ int of_platform_bus_probe(struct device_node *root,
>  	struct device_node *child;
>  	struct platform_device *dev;
>  	int rc = 0;
> +	const void *compat;
> +	const struct of_device_id *match;
>  
>  	if (WARN_ON(!matches || matches == OF_NO_DEEP_PROBE))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -741,16 +743,32 @@ int of_platform_bus_probe(struct device_node *root,
>  		rc = of_platform_bus_create(root, matches, &dev->dev);
>  		goto bail;
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Register each child node if either:
> +	 *  a) it has a 'compatible' value indicating they are a device, or
> +	 *  b) it is specified by the 'matches' table (by name or device_type)
> +	 * If a node is specified in the matches table, then all its children
> +	 * also get registered.
> +	 */
>  	for_each_child_of_node(root, child) {
> -		if (!of_match_node(matches, child))
> +		compat = of_get_property(child, "compatible", NULL);
> +		match = of_match_node(matches, child);
> +		if (!compat && !match)
>  			continue;
>  
> -		pr_debug("  match: %s\n", child->full_name);
> +		pr_debug("  register device: %s\n", child->full_name);
>  		dev = of_platform_device_create(child, NULL, parent);
> -		if (dev == NULL)
> +		if (!dev) {
>  			rc = -ENOMEM;
> -		else
> -			rc = of_platform_bus_create(child, matches, &dev->dev);
> +			of_node_put(child);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		if (!match)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		pr_debug("  register children of: %s\n", child->full_name);
> +		rc = of_platform_bus_create(child, matches, &dev->dev);
>  		if (rc) {
>  			of_node_put(child);
>  			break;
> -- 
> 1.5.4.5
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-30  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-10 10:52 [PATCH 3/3 v2] of/device: Register children with a compatible value in of_platform_bus_probe() Lan Chunhe
2010-12-30  6:50 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2010-12-30  7:23   ` Lan Chunhe
2010-12-30  7:31     ` Grant Likely
2010-12-30  8:04       ` Lan Chunhe
2010-12-30 19:37         ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101230065045.GB843@angua.secretlab.ca \
    --to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=b25806@freescale.com \
    --cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox