linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Blanchard, Hollis" <Hollis_Blanchard@mentor.com>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Saxena,
	Deepak" <deepak_saxena@mentor.com>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/device: Don't register disabled devices
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:35:35 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110105233535.GB8846@yookeroo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DD7A9A95166BF4418C4C1EB2033B6EE2038FA8E5@na3-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:53:27PM -0800, Blanchard, Hollis wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 03:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Device nodes with the property status="disabled" are not usable and so
> > don't register them when parsing the device tree for devices.
> >
> This is great and all, but a fair amount of driver code explicitly 
> searches the tree, rather than registering a probe function. That's why 
> our earlier patches in this area were more comprehensive.
> 
> What are your thoughts on handling those cases?

One by one.  Trying to handle the explicit searches automagically is
just asking for trouble.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-05 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-03 23:01 [PATCH] of/device: Don't register disabled devices Grant Likely
2011-01-05 22:53 ` Blanchard, Hollis
2011-01-05 23:35   ` David Gibson [this message]
2011-01-07 17:23     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110105233535.GB8846@yookeroo \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=Hollis_Blanchard@mentor.com \
    --cc=deepak_saxena@mentor.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).