From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:54:15 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: [PATCH 1/8] powerpc: Move all ppc_md kexec function pointers together Message-ID: <20110107145415.4fa304eb@kryten> In-Reply-To: <20110107145255.72cf30ba@kryten> References: <20110107145255.72cf30ba@kryten> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Move all the kexec handlers together. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard --- Index: powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h =================================================================== --- powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h 2011-01-07 12:50:52.020438276 +1100 +++ powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h 2011-01-07 12:51:46.682161055 +1100 @@ -118,9 +118,6 @@ struct machdep_calls { * If for some reason there is no irq, but the interrupt * shouldn't be counted as spurious, return NO_IRQ_IGNORE. */ unsigned int (*get_irq)(void); -#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC - void (*kexec_cpu_down)(int crash_shutdown, int secondary); -#endif /* PCI stuff */ /* Called after scanning the bus, before allocating resources */ @@ -237,6 +234,8 @@ struct machdep_calls { void (*machine_shutdown)(void); #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC + void (*kexec_cpu_down)(int crash_shutdown, int secondary); + /* Called to do the minimal shutdown needed to run a kexec'd kernel * to run successfully. * XXX Should we move this one out of kexec scope?