From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] De-couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:44:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110110184416.GA18974@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D2B4B38.80102@austin.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:08:56PM -0600, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> This is a re-send of the remaining patches that did not make it
> into the last kernel release for de-coupling sysfs memory
> directories from memory sections. The first three patches of the
> previous set went in, and this is the remaining patches that
> need to be applied.
Well, it's a bit late right now, as we are merging stuff that is already
in our trees, and we are busy with that, so this is likely to be ignored
until after .38-rc1 is out.
So, care to resend this after .38-rc1 is out so people can pay attention
to it?
> The root of this issue is in sysfs directory creation. Every time
> a directory is created a string compare is done against all sibling
> directories to ensure we do not create duplicates. The list of
> directory nodes in sysfs is kept as an unsorted list which results
> in this being an exponentially longer operation as the number of
> directories are created.
Are you sure this is still an issue? I thought we solved this last
kernel or so with a simple patch?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-10 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-10 18:08 [PATCH 0/4] De-couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-10 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] allow memory blocks to span multiple " Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-10 18:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] Update phys_index to [start|end]_section_nr Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-10 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] Define memory_block_size_bytes for powerpc/pseries Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-10 18:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] Define memory_block_size_bytes for x86_64 with CONFIG_X86_UV defined Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-10 18:44 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-01-10 18:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] De-couple sysfs memory directories from memory sections Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-10 19:11 ` Robin Holt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-01-20 16:36 Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-20 16:45 ` Greg KH
2011-01-20 16:51 ` Nathan Fontenot
2011-01-20 17:25 ` Greg KH
2011-01-20 17:09 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110110184416.GA18974@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).