linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/9] powerpc: Never halt RTAS error logging after receiving an unrecoverable machine check
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:46:29 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110112164629.47585ca9@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110112164318.753a435b@kryten>


Newer versions of the System p firwmare send a partial RTAS error log in the
machine check handler with a more detailed response appearing sometime later
via check event.

This means at machine check time we do not have enough information to
ascertain exactly what went on. Furthermore, I have found the RTAS error
logs in the machine check handler contain no useful information, so halting on
them makes little sense. If we want to halt it would make more sense to do
it following the error log received sometime later via check event.

In light of this, never halt the error log in the pseries machine
check handler.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---

Index: powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c
===================================================================
--- powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c	2010-09-27 21:19:32.805480948 +1000
+++ powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/ras.c	2010-10-15 13:23:34.161268941 +1100
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int recover_mce(struct pt_regs *r
 		nonfatal = 1;
 	}
 
-	log_error((char *)err, ERR_TYPE_RTAS_LOG, !nonfatal);
+	log_error((char *)err, ERR_TYPE_RTAS_LOG, 0);
 
 	return nonfatal;
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-12  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  5:43 [PATCH 0/9] Machine check handling fixes Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Print 32 bits of DSISR in show_regs Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:45 ` [PATCH 2/9] powerpc: Don't force MSR_RI in machine_check_exception Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:46 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2011-01-12  5:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] powerpc: Remove duplicate debugger hook " Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:48 ` [PATCH 5/9] powerpc: Don't silently handle machine checks from userspace Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] powerpc: Rework pseries machine check handler Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:50 ` [PATCH 7/9] powerpc: Fix corruption when grabbing FWNMI data Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] powerpc: Check RTAS extended log flag before checking length Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: machine_check_generic is wrong on 64bit Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110112164629.47585ca9@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).