linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/9] powerpc: Don't silently handle machine checks from userspace
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:48:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110112164814.4f6e27f4@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110112164318.753a435b@kryten>


If a machine check comes from userspace we send a SIGBUS to the task and
fail to printk anything.

If we are taking machine checks due to bad hardware we want to know about
it right away. Furthermore if we don't complain loudly then it will look
a lot like a bug in the userspace application, potentially causing a lot
of confusion.

Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
---

I seem to remember this might be here for X on 32bit. If necessary I can
wrap it in an ifdef CONFIG_PPC32.

Index: powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
===================================================================
--- powerpc.git.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c	2011-01-11 13:46:47.391281975 +1100
+++ powerpc.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c	2011-01-11 13:46:49.141336198 +1100
@@ -626,11 +626,6 @@ void machine_check_exception(struct pt_r
 	if (recover > 0)
 		return;
 
-	if (user_mode(regs)) {
-		_exception(SIGBUS, regs, BUS_ADRERR, regs->nip);
-		return;
-	}
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_8xx) && defined(CONFIG_PCI)
 	/* the qspan pci read routines can cause machine checks -- Cort
 	 *

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-01-12  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-12  5:43 [PATCH 0/9] Machine check handling fixes Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:44 ` [PATCH 1/9] powerpc: Print 32 bits of DSISR in show_regs Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:45 ` [PATCH 2/9] powerpc: Don't force MSR_RI in machine_check_exception Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] powerpc: Never halt RTAS error logging after receiving an unrecoverable machine check Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:47 ` [PATCH 4/9] powerpc: Remove duplicate debugger hook in machine_check_exception Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:48 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2011-01-12  5:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] powerpc: Rework pseries machine check handler Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:50 ` [PATCH 7/9] powerpc: Fix corruption when grabbing FWNMI data Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] powerpc: Check RTAS extended log flag before checking length Anton Blanchard
2011-01-12  5:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] powerpc: machine_check_generic is wrong on 64bit Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110112164814.4f6e27f4@kryten \
    --to=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).