From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:12:10 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt: Move device tree documentation out of powerpc directory Message-ID: <20110126191210.GA3377@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <1296062434-18027-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1296062434-18027-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:20:34AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote: > The device tree is used by more than just PowerPC. Make the documentation > directory available to all. How does the planned stucture look like for this new directory? I see that in your move the architecture is dropped. But some of these looks like they are arch candidates. The 4xx/* for example looks like powerpc stuff that should be in a powerpc directory. Another is sja1000. This is obviously a can driver. So how about mirroring the kernel structure: Proposal: drivers/net/can <=== sja1000.txt drivers/ata/ <=== fsl/sata.txt arch/powerpc <=== powerpc specific stuff This is a bit more effort but then we end up with a well-known structure. Sam