From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx01.d-labs.de (ist.d-labs.de [213.239.218.44]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7853D1007D6 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 22:22:38 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 12:13:26 +0100 From: Florian Mickler To: Joe Perches Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: disable MSI using new interface if possible Message-ID: <20110304121326.03688af1@schatten.dmk.lab> In-Reply-To: <1299209359.4338.220.camel@Joe-Laptop> References: <1299200729.3630.52.camel@concordia> <1299202862-10682-1-git-send-email-nacc@us.ibm.com> <1299208016.3630.81.camel@concordia> <1299209359.4338.220.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:29:19 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > > $ git log --pretty=format:"%an %ae" arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/msi.c > > Andre Detsch adetsch@br.ibm.com > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > Michael Ellerman michael@ellerman.id.au > > > > And the patch from Andre was also signed off by me. > > How nice for you. Last patch from you was > 2 years ago. > The problem is, that it get's pretty slow if you don't do a time cut-off... i don't know the complexity but i guess it's linear in (number of files) * (number of commits) * (avg size of diffs) ... (if you compute the diffstat) What I'll probably try as soon as I have another few hours to spare for get_maintainer.pl, is to implement a fall back to older history if the data basis is not stable enough. > > CC'ing inactive non named maintainers via git > history also draws complaints btw. > Yes. I guess, my current version could use an staggered approach where it does more digging if the results are too volatile... but first try to be fast ... Regards, Flo