From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vx0-f170.google.com (mail-vx0-f170.google.com [209.85.220.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF35B7103 for ; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 23:21:03 +1100 (EST) Received: by vxb39 with SMTP id 39so543926vxb.15 for ; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 04:20:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 20:20:46 +0800 From: =?utf-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico?= Wang To: Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kdump: Allow shrinking of kdump region to be overridden Message-ID: <20110309122046.GC16951@cr0.redhat.com> References: <20100825002258.GD28360@kryten> <4D771EE6.5050404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4D771EE6.5050404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Anton Blanchard List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:02:06PM +0530, Mahesh Jagannath Salgaonkar wrote: >On 08/25/2010 06:07 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Anton Blanchard writes: >> >>> On ppc64 the crashkernel region almost always overlaps an area of firmware. >>> This works fine except when using the sysfs interface to reduce the kdump >>> region. If we free the firmware area we are guaranteed to crash. >> >> That is ppc64 bug. firmware should not be in the reserved region. Any >> random kernel like thing can be put in to that region at any valid >> address and the fact that shrinking the region frees your firmware means >> that using that region could also stomp your firmware (which I assume >> would be a bad thing). >The issue only happens while shrinking the region using sysfs interface. >We already have checks in kexec for not to stomp over on the firmware >overlap area while loading capture kernel. Currently we do a top-down >allocation for the firmware region which means it sits at the top of the >RMO, right in the middle of the crashdump region. We can not move the >crashkernel region beyond firmware region because kernel needs its some >of memory in RMO region. The crashkernel region is specified via kernel cmdline, so why not just drop a failure when it overlaps with RMO region? Am I missing something? Thanks.