* [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/e500v2: Save SPEFCSR in flush_spe_to_thread()
@ 2011-03-28 19:24 Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() Scott Wood
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-03-28 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: agraf; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
giveup_spe() saves the SPE state which is protected by MSR[SPE].
However, modifying SPEFSCR does not trap when MSR[SPE]=0.
And since SPEFSCR is already saved/restored in _switch(),
not all the callers want to save SPEFSCR again.
Thus, saving SPEFSCR should not belong to giveup_spe().
This patch moves SPEFSCR saving to flush_spe_to_thread(),
and cleans up the caller that needs to save SPEFSCR accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
Kumar, could you ack this to go via the KVM tree, since the KVM
SPE save/restore patches depend on it?
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S | 2 --
arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 1 +
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 5 +----
3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S
index 3e02710..b84fc5e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S
@@ -792,8 +792,6 @@ _GLOBAL(giveup_spe)
evmwumiaa evr6, evr6, evr6 /* evr6 <- ACC = 0 * 0 + ACC */
li r4,THREAD_ACC
evstddx evr6, r4, r3 /* save off accumulator */
- mfspr r6,SPRN_SPEFSCR
- stw r6,THREAD_SPEFSCR(r3) /* save spefscr register value */
beq 1f
lwz r4,_MSR-STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD(r5)
lis r3,MSR_SPE@h
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
index f74f355..138e7dd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ void flush_spe_to_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
BUG_ON(tsk != current);
#endif
+ tsk->thread.spefscr = mfspr(SPRN_SPEFSCR);
giveup_spe(tsk);
}
preempt_enable();
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index bd74fac..0ed23d1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -1356,10 +1356,7 @@ void SPEFloatingPointException(struct pt_regs *regs)
int code = 0;
int err;
- preempt_disable();
- if (regs->msr & MSR_SPE)
- giveup_spe(current);
- preempt_enable();
+ flush_spe_to_thread(current);
spefscr = current->thread.spefscr;
fpexc_mode = current->thread.fpexc_mode;
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run()
2011-03-28 19:24 [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/e500v2: Save SPEFCSR in flush_spe_to_thread() Scott Wood
@ 2011-03-28 19:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-03-29 9:31 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2 Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host Scott Wood
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-03-28 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: agraf; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
We need to save/restore SPE environment on e500 core.
Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() so that we can put the SPE code in
e500.c.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c | 5 +++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 1 -
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 5 +++++
5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
index ecb3bc7..4e7a1be 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum emulation_result {
EMULATE_AGAIN, /* something went wrong. go again */
};
+extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
extern char kvmppc_handlers_start[];
extern unsigned long kvmppc_handler_len;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
index 74d0e74..3d2e7d2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
@@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu_44x);
}
+int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
+}
+
static int __init kvmppc_44x_init(void)
{
int r;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
index c961de4..fb12853 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
@@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vfree(vcpu_book3s);
}
-extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int ret;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
index 1cc471f..ab29f5f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ heavyweight_exit:
* r3: kvm_run pointer
* r4: vcpu pointer
*/
-_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_run)
+_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_entry)
stwu r1, -HOST_STACK_SIZE(r1)
stw r1, VCPU_HOST_STACK(r4) /* Save stack pointer to vcpu. */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
index e3768ee..e762634 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
@@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ int kvmppc_core_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
return 0;
}
+int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
+}
+
/* 'linear_address' is actually an encoding of AS|PID|EADDR . */
int kvmppc_core_vcpu_translate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_translation *tr)
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2
2011-03-28 19:24 [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/e500v2: Save SPEFCSR in flush_spe_to_thread() Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() Scott Wood
@ 2011-03-28 19:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-03-29 9:37 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host Scott Wood
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-03-28 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: agraf; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
In order to use lazy SPE register save/restore, we need to
know when the guest is using MSR[SPE]. In order to do that, we
need to control the actual MSR[SPE] separately from the guest's
notion of MSR[SPE].
Only bits set in msr_block can be changed by the guest in the real MSR.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 6 +++++-
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 3 +++
5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index bba3b9b..c376f6b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -217,6 +217,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
ulong xer;
u32 cr;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
+ ulong msr_block;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
ulong shadow_msr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 23e6a93..75b72c7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -403,6 +403,9 @@ int main(void)
DEFINE(VCPU_SHARED, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.shared));
DEFINE(VCPU_SHARED_MSR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu_arch_shared, msr));
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
+ DEFINE(VCPU_MSR_BLOCK, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.msr_block));
+#endif
/* book3s */
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S
DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_RETIP, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.host_retip));
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h
index 492bb70..303a415 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h
@@ -52,6 +52,23 @@
extern unsigned long kvmppc_booke_handlers;
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
+static inline bool kvmppc_msr_block_has(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 block_bit)
+{
+ return !(vcpu->arch.msr_block & block_bit);
+}
+
+static inline void kvmppc_set_msr_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 block_bit)
+{
+ vcpu->arch.msr_block &= ~block_bit;
+}
+
+static inline void kvmppc_clr_msr_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 block_bit)
+{
+ vcpu->arch.msr_block |= block_bit;
+}
+#endif
+
/* Helper function for "full" MSR writes. No need to call this if only EE is
* changing. */
static inline void kvmppc_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 new_msr)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
index ab29f5f..92193c7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
@@ -409,7 +409,6 @@ lightweight_exit:
mtctr r3
lwz r3, VCPU_CR(r4)
mtcr r3
- lwz r5, VCPU_GPR(r5)(r4)
lwz r6, VCPU_GPR(r6)(r4)
lwz r7, VCPU_GPR(r7)(r4)
lwz r8, VCPU_GPR(r8)(r4)
@@ -419,6 +418,11 @@ lightweight_exit:
lwz r3, (VCPU_SHARED_MSR + 4)(r3)
oris r3, r3, KVMPPC_MSR_MASK@h
ori r3, r3, KVMPPC_MSR_MASK@l
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_BOOKE
+ lwz r5, VCPU_MSR_BLOCK(r4)
+ and r3, r3, r5
+#endif
+ lwz r5, VCPU_GPR(r5)(r4)
mtsrr1 r3
/* Clear any debug events which occurred since we disabled MSR[DE].
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
index e762634..acfe052 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ int kvmppc_core_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Since booke kvm only support one core, update all vcpus' PIR to 0 */
vcpu->vcpu_id = 0;
+ /* Unblock all msr bits */
+ kvmppc_clr_msr_block(vcpu, ~0UL);
+
return 0;
}
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host
2011-03-28 19:24 [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/e500v2: Save SPEFCSR in flush_spe_to_thread() Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2 Scott Wood
@ 2011-03-28 19:25 ` Scott Wood
2011-03-29 9:47 ` Alexander Graf
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-03-28 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: agraf; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
This patch provide a lazy way to do SPE switch.
The SPE save/restore will be done only if it's needed.
Linux already switches SPEFSCR on context switch (non-lazily), so the
only remaining bit is to save it between qemu and the guest.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +++
arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 6 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 15 +++++++-
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index c376f6b..171cd85 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
u64 fpr[32];
u64 fpscr;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ ulong evr[32];
+ ulong spefscr;
+ ulong host_spefscr;
+ u64 acc;
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
vector128 vr[32];
vector128 vscr;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 75b72c7..554f4d6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -497,6 +497,12 @@ int main(void)
DEFINE(TLBCAM_MAS3, offsetof(struct tlbcam, MAS3));
DEFINE(TLBCAM_MAS7, offsetof(struct tlbcam, MAS7));
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ DEFINE(VCPU_EVR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.evr[0]));
+ DEFINE(VCPU_ACC, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.acc));
+ DEFINE(VCPU_SPEFSCR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.spefscr));
+ DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_SPEFSCR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.host_spefscr));
+#endif /* CONFIG_SPE */
#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXIT_TIMING
DEFINE(VCPU_TIMING_EXIT_TBU, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
index ef76acb..4e9c1a9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
* Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
*
* Copyright IBM Corp. 2007
+ * Copyright (C) 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
*
* Authors: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
* Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@@ -344,10 +345,19 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
r = RESUME_GUEST;
break;
- case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_UNAVAIL:
- kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_UNAVAIL);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_UNAVAIL: {
+ extern void kvmppc_vcpu_spe_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+ /* reload the SPE env if guest first use SPE since last save */
+ if (kvmppc_msr_block_has(vcpu, MSR_SPE))
+ kvmppc_vcpu_spe_load(vcpu);
+
+ if (!(vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_SPE))
+ kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_UNAVAIL);
r = RESUME_GUEST;
break;
+ }
case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_FP_DATA:
kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_FP_DATA);
@@ -358,6 +368,7 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_FP_ROUND);
r = RESUME_GUEST;
break;
+#endif
case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_DATA_STORAGE:
kvmppc_core_queue_data_storage(vcpu, vcpu->arch.fault_dear,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
index 92193c7..910ec66 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
@@ -241,6 +241,14 @@ _GLOBAL(kvmppc_resume_host)
heavyweight_exit:
/* Not returning to guest. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ /* save guest SPEFSCR and load host SPEFSCR */
+ mfspr r9, SPRN_SPEFSCR
+ stw r9, VCPU_SPEFSCR(r4)
+ lwz r9, VCPU_HOST_SPEFSCR(r4)
+ mtspr SPRN_SPEFSCR, r9
+#endif
+
/* We already saved guest volatile register state; now save the
* non-volatiles. */
stw r15, VCPU_GPR(r15)(r4)
@@ -342,6 +350,14 @@ _GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_entry)
lwz r30, VCPU_GPR(r30)(r4)
lwz r31, VCPU_GPR(r31)(r4)
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ /* save host SPEFSCR and load guest SPEFSCR */
+ mfspr r3, SPRN_SPEFSCR
+ stw r3, VCPU_HOST_SPEFSCR(r4)
+ lwz r3, VCPU_SPEFSCR(r4)
+ mtspr SPRN_SPEFSCR, r3
+#endif
+
lightweight_exit:
stw r2, HOST_R2(r1)
@@ -435,3 +451,49 @@ lightweight_exit:
lwz r3, VCPU_GPR(r3)(r4)
lwz r4, VCPU_GPR(r4)(r4)
rfi
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+#define KVMPPC_SAVE_EVR(n,s,base) evmergehi s,s,n; stw s,(4*(n))(base)
+#define KVMPPC_SAVE_2EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_SAVE_EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_SAVE_EVR(n+1,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_SAVE_4EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_SAVE_2EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_SAVE_2EVR(n+2,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_SAVE_8EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_SAVE_4EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_SAVE_4EVR(n+4,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_SAVE_16EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_SAVE_8EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_SAVE_8EVR(n+8,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_SAVE_32EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_SAVE_16EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_SAVE_16EVR(n+16,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_LOAD_EVR(n,s,base) lwz s,(4*(n))(base); evmergelo n,s,n
+#define KVMPPC_LOAD_2EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_LOAD_EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_LOAD_EVR(n+1,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_LOAD_4EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_LOAD_2EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_LOAD_2EVR(n+2,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_LOAD_8EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_LOAD_4EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_LOAD_4EVR(n+4,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_LOAD_16EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_LOAD_8EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_LOAD_8EVR(n+8,s,base)
+#define KVMPPC_LOAD_32EVR(n,s,base) KVMPPC_LOAD_16EVR(n,s,base); \
+ KVMPPC_LOAD_16EVR(n+16,s,base)
+
+_GLOBAL(kvmppc_save_guest_spe)
+ cmpi 0,r3,0
+ beqlr-
+ addi r5,r3,VCPU_EVR
+ KVMPPC_SAVE_32EVR(0,r4,r5) /* save evr[32] */
+ evxor evr6, evr6, evr6
+ evmwumiaa evr6, evr6, evr6
+ li r4,VCPU_ACC
+ evstddx evr6, r4, r3 /* save acc */
+ blr
+
+_GLOBAL(kvmppc_load_guest_spe)
+ cmpi 0,r3,0
+ beqlr-
+ li r4,VCPU_ACC
+ evlddx evr6,r4,r3
+ evmra evr6,evr6 /* load acc */
+ addi r5,r3,VCPU_EVR
+ KVMPPC_LOAD_32EVR(0,r4,r5) /* load evr[32] */
+ blr
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
index acfe052..038bc37 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright (C) 2008 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. All rights reserved.
*
* Author: Yu Liu, <yu.liu@freescale.com>
*
@@ -25,6 +25,25 @@
#include "booke.h"
#include "e500_tlb.h"
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+extern void kvmppc_load_guest_spe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+extern void kvmppc_save_guest_spe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+void kvmppc_vcpu_spe_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ enable_kernel_spe();
+ kvmppc_save_guest_spe(vcpu);
+ kvmppc_set_msr_block(vcpu, MSR_SPE);
+}
+
+void kvmppc_vcpu_spe_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ enable_kernel_spe();
+ kvmppc_load_guest_spe(vcpu);
+ kvmppc_clr_msr_block(vcpu, MSR_SPE);
+}
+#endif
+
void kvmppc_core_load_host_debugstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
}
@@ -41,6 +60,11 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)
void kvmppc_core_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
kvmppc_e500_tlb_put(vcpu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ /* save SPE env if guest has used SPE since last save */
+ if (!kvmppc_msr_block_has(vcpu, MSR_SPE))
+ kvmppc_vcpu_spe_put(vcpu);
+#endif
}
int kvmppc_core_check_processor_compat(void)
@@ -75,7 +99,24 @@ int kvmppc_core_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
- return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
+ int ret;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ /*
+ * if guest is using SPE, we reload the env.
+ * otherwise we do it when needed.
+ */
+ if (vcpu->arch.shared->msr & MSR_SPE)
+ kvmppc_vcpu_spe_load(vcpu);
+#endif
+ ret = __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
+#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
+ /* save SPE env if guest has used SPE since last save */
+ if (!kvmppc_msr_block_has(vcpu, MSR_SPE))
+ kvmppc_vcpu_spe_put(vcpu);
+#endif
+
+ return ret;
}
/* 'linear_address' is actually an encoding of AS|PID|EADDR . */
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run()
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() Scott Wood
@ 2011-03-29 9:31 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-29 9:36 ` Liu Yu-B13201
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2011-03-29 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Wood; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
> From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
>=20
> We need to save/restore SPE environment on e500 core.
> Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() so that we can put the SPE code in
> e500.c.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c | 5 +++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 5 +++++
> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h =
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> index ecb3bc7..4e7a1be 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum emulation_result {
> EMULATE_AGAIN, /* something went wrong. go again */
> };
>=20
> +extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct =
kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu =
*vcpu);
> extern char kvmppc_handlers_start[];
> extern unsigned long kvmppc_handler_len;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
> index 74d0e74..3d2e7d2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
> @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu_44x);
> }
>=20
> +int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
440 calls _entry on _run
> +}
> +
> static int __init kvmppc_44x_init(void)
> {
> int r;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> index c961de4..fb12853 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> @@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct kvm_vcpu =
*vcpu)
> vfree(vcpu_book3s);
> }
>=20
> -extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct =
kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
BookS loses its _entry reference?
> int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> int ret;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S =
b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
> index 1cc471f..ab29f5f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ heavyweight_exit:
> * r3: kvm_run pointer
> * r4: vcpu pointer
> */
> -_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_run)
> +_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_entry)
BookE calls _run _entry now
> stwu r1, -HOST_STACK_SIZE(r1)
> stw r1, VCPU_HOST_STACK(r4) /* Save stack pointer to vcpu. =
*/
>=20
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
> index e3768ee..e762634 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ int kvmppc_core_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return 0;
> }
>=20
> +int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
> +}
e500 calls _entry on _run
So you're basically adding a C wrapper around _entry. That's fine for =
me, but what is the BookS change about?
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run()
2011-03-29 9:31 ` Alexander Graf
@ 2011-03-29 9:36 ` Liu Yu-B13201
2011-03-29 9:48 ` Alexander Graf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Liu Yu-B13201 @ 2011-03-29 9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf, Wood Scott-B07421; +Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From:=20
> linuxppc-dev-bounces+b13201=3Dfreescale.com@lists.ozlabs.org=20
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+b13201=3Dfreescale.com@lists.ozlabs
> .org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:32 PM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run()
>=20
>=20
> On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
>=20
> > From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
> >=20
> > We need to save/restore SPE environment on e500 core.
> > Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() so that we can put the SPE code in
> > e500.c.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c | 5 +++++
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 1 -
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 2 +-
> > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 5 +++++
> > 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >=20
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h=20
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> > index ecb3bc7..4e7a1be 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum emulation_result {
> > EMULATE_AGAIN, /* something went wrong. go again */
> > };
> >=20
> > +extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,=20
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,=20
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > extern char kvmppc_handlers_start[];
> > extern unsigned long kvmppc_handler_len;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
> > index 74d0e74..3d2e7d2 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
> > @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct=20
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu_44x);
> > }
> >=20
> > +int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct=20
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
>=20
> 440 calls _entry on _run
>=20
> > +}
> > +
> > static int __init kvmppc_44x_init(void)
> > {
> > int r;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> > index c961de4..fb12853 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> > @@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct=20
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > vfree(vcpu_book3s);
> > }
> >=20
> > -extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,=20
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>=20
> BookS loses its _entry reference?
>=20
> > int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct=20
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S=20
> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
> > index 1cc471f..ab29f5f 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
> > @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ heavyweight_exit:
> > * r3: kvm_run pointer
> > * r4: vcpu pointer
> > */
> > -_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_run)
> > +_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_entry)
>=20
> BookE calls _run _entry now
>=20
> > stwu r1, -HOST_STACK_SIZE(r1)
> > stw r1, VCPU_HOST_STACK(r4) /* Save stack pointer=20
> to vcpu. */
> >=20
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
> > index e3768ee..e762634 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
> > @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ int kvmppc_core_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >=20
> > +int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct=20
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > +{
> > + return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
> > +}
>=20
> e500 calls _entry on _run
>=20
>=20
> So you're basically adding a C wrapper around _entry. That's=20
> fine for me, but what is the BookS change about?
>=20
Hi Alex,
The declaration for Book3S is moved to global header.
Thanks,
Yu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2 Scott Wood
@ 2011-03-29 9:37 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-29 17:26 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2011-03-29 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Wood; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
> From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
>=20
> In order to use lazy SPE register save/restore, we need to
> know when the guest is using MSR[SPE]. In order to do that, we
> need to control the actual MSR[SPE] separately from the guest's
> notion of MSR[SPE].
Please make this generic for BookE. There's no reason to have FSL ifdefs =
in the code.
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host Scott Wood
@ 2011-03-29 9:47 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-29 17:25 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2011-03-29 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Scott Wood; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
> From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
>=20
> This patch provide a lazy way to do SPE switch.
> The SPE save/restore will be done only if it's needed.
>=20
> Linux already switches SPEFSCR on context switch (non-lazily), so the
> only remaining bit is to save it between qemu and the guest.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 6 +++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 6 +++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 15 +++++++-
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 62 =
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h =
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index c376f6b..171cd85 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
> u64 fpr[32];
> u64 fpscr;
>=20
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
> + ulong evr[32];
> + ulong spefscr;
> + ulong host_spefscr;
> + u64 acc;
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> vector128 vr[32];
> vector128 vscr;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c =
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 75b72c7..554f4d6 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -497,6 +497,12 @@ int main(void)
> DEFINE(TLBCAM_MAS3, offsetof(struct tlbcam, MAS3));
> DEFINE(TLBCAM_MAS7, offsetof(struct tlbcam, MAS7));
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
> + DEFINE(VCPU_EVR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.evr[0]));
> + DEFINE(VCPU_ACC, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.acc));
> + DEFINE(VCPU_SPEFSCR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, arch.spefscr));
> + DEFINE(VCPU_HOST_SPEFSCR, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu, =
arch.host_spefscr));
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPE */
>=20
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_EXIT_TIMING
> DEFINE(VCPU_TIMING_EXIT_TBU, offsetof(struct kvm_vcpu,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> index ef76acb..4e9c1a9 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> * Foundation, 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA =
02110-1301, USA.
> *
> * Copyright IBM Corp. 2007
> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
> *
> * Authors: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@us.ibm.com>
> * Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> @@ -344,10 +345,19 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, =
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> r =3D RESUME_GUEST;
> break;
>=20
> - case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_UNAVAIL:
> - kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, =
BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_UNAVAIL);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
> + case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_UNAVAIL: {
This means that on non-SPE enabled host kernels you'll get a KVM fatal =
error when the guest triggers SPE_UNAVAIL, as the exit simply isn't =
handled and triggers:
default:
printk(KERN_EMERG "exit_nr %d\n", exit_nr);
BUG();
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run()
2011-03-29 9:36 ` Liu Yu-B13201
@ 2011-03-29 9:48 ` Alexander Graf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Graf @ 2011-03-29 9:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liu Yu-B13201; +Cc: Wood Scott-B07421, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
On 29.03.2011, at 11:36, Liu Yu-B13201 wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>> linuxppc-dev-bounces+b13201=freescale.com@lists.ozlabs.org
>> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+b13201=freescale.com@lists.ozlabs
>> .org] On Behalf Of Alexander Graf
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:32 PM
>> To: Wood Scott-B07421
>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run()
>>
>>
>> On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
>>
>>> From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
>>>
>>> We need to save/restore SPE environment on e500 core.
>>> Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() so that we can put the SPE code in
>>> e500.c.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liu Yu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 1 +
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c | 5 +++++
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 1 -
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S | 2 +-
>>> arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 5 +++++
>>> 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>>> index ecb3bc7..4e7a1be 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h
>>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum emulation_result {
>>> EMULATE_AGAIN, /* something went wrong. go again */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>> extern char kvmppc_handlers_start[];
>>> extern unsigned long kvmppc_handler_len;
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
>>> index 74d0e74..3d2e7d2 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/44x.c
>>> @@ -147,6 +147,11 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vcpu_44x);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> + return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
>>
>> 440 calls _entry on _run
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int __init kvmppc_44x_init(void)
>>> {
>>> int r;
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>>> index c961de4..fb12853 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
>>> @@ -1379,7 +1379,6 @@ void kvmppc_core_vcpu_free(struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> vfree(vcpu_book3s);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -extern int __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(struct kvm_run *kvm_run,
>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>> BookS loses its _entry reference?
>>
>>> int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> {
>>> int ret;
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
>>> index 1cc471f..ab29f5f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S
>>> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ heavyweight_exit:
>>> * r3: kvm_run pointer
>>> * r4: vcpu pointer
>>> */
>>> -_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_run)
>>> +_GLOBAL(__kvmppc_vcpu_entry)
>>
>> BookE calls _run _entry now
>>
>>> stwu r1, -HOST_STACK_SIZE(r1)
>>> stw r1, VCPU_HOST_STACK(r4) /* Save stack pointer
>> to vcpu. */
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
>>> index e3768ee..e762634 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c
>>> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ int kvmppc_core_vcpu_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +int __kvmppc_vcpu_run(struct kvm_run *kvm_run, struct
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> +{
>>> + return __kvmppc_vcpu_entry(kvm_run, vcpu);
>>> +}
>>
>> e500 calls _entry on _run
>>
>>
>> So you're basically adding a C wrapper around _entry. That's
>> fine for me, but what is the BookS change about?
>>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> The declaration for Book3S is moved to global header.
Ah, I missed the first chunk :). Thanks!
Alex
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host
2011-03-29 9:47 ` Alexander Graf
@ 2011-03-29 17:25 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-03-29 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:47:51 +0200
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
> On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > @@ -344,10 +345,19 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > r = RESUME_GUEST;
> > break;
> >
> > - case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_UNAVAIL:
> > - kvmppc_booke_queue_irqprio(vcpu, BOOKE_IRQPRIO_SPE_UNAVAIL);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SPE
> > + case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_SPE_UNAVAIL: {
>
> This means that on non-SPE enabled host kernels you'll get a KVM fatal error when the guest triggers SPE_UNAVAIL, as the exit simply isn't handled and triggers:
>
> default:
> printk(KERN_EMERG "exit_nr %d\n", exit_nr);
> BUG();
Right, thanks for spotting -- will have it send an illegal instruction trap
to the guest in that case.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2
2011-03-29 9:37 ` Alexander Graf
@ 2011-03-29 17:26 ` Scott Wood
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Scott Wood @ 2011-03-29 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alexander Graf; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:37:44 +0200
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> > From: yu liu <yu.liu@freescale.com>
> >
> > In order to use lazy SPE register save/restore, we need to
> > know when the guest is using MSR[SPE]. In order to do that, we
> > need to control the actual MSR[SPE] separately from the guest's
> > notion of MSR[SPE].
>
> Please make this generic for BookE. There's no reason to have FSL ifdefs in the code.
Yeah, I was wondering about that too. Will respin.
-Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-29 17:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-28 19:24 [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/e500v2: Save SPEFCSR in flush_spe_to_thread() Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: PPC: booke: Wrap __kvmppc_vcpu_run() Scott Wood
2011-03-29 9:31 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-29 9:36 ` Liu Yu-B13201
2011-03-29 9:48 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2 Scott Wood
2011-03-29 9:37 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-29 17:26 ` Scott Wood
2011-03-28 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: PPC: e500: SPE switch between guest and host Scott Wood
2011-03-29 9:47 ` Alexander Graf
2011-03-29 17:25 ` Scott Wood
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).