From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Cybertrust SureServer Standard Validation CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AADB3B6F06 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:27:54 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:26:40 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Alexander Graf Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: PPC: e500: Introduce msr_block for e500v2 Message-ID: <20110329122640.075f416d@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <76DF6B63-BCFC-4B8D-80A8-6C1578C6A22C@suse.de> References: <20110328192558.GB11104@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <76DF6B63-BCFC-4B8D-80A8-6C1578C6A22C@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:37:44 +0200 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 28.03.2011, at 21:25, Scott Wood wrote: > > > From: yu liu > > > > In order to use lazy SPE register save/restore, we need to > > know when the guest is using MSR[SPE]. In order to do that, we > > need to control the actual MSR[SPE] separately from the guest's > > notion of MSR[SPE]. > > Please make this generic for BookE. There's no reason to have FSL ifdefs in the code. Yeah, I was wondering about that too. Will respin. -Scott