From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e34.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2350B6F0C for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 07:08:25 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p3FKuDuS017648 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:56:13 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id p3FL8Kwu125908 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:08:20 -0600 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id p3FL8KKQ003135 for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:08:20 -0600 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:08:19 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix kexec-related UP build error Message-ID: <20110415210819.GE2283@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20110415202916.GA6758@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110415210051.GA31245@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20110415210051.GA31245@us.ibm.com> Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:00:51PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On 15.04.2011 [13:29:16 -0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Hello! > > > > The following patch fixes a UP build problem for kexec() on powerpc. > > When the crash_kexec_wait_realmode() function was added, it was > > placed in only two of the three required locations. > > I believe the fix has already been posted as > > http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2011-April/089559.html So it has! Thank you for the pointer. Thanx, Paul