From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Milton Miller <miltonm@bga.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:03:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110420123330.GB3519@amit-x200.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hvc-kick-notask-2@mdm.bga.com>
On (Mon) 28 Mar 2011 [11:52:05], Milton Miller wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 about 14:17:14 +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Thu) 24 Mar 2011 [08:58:04], Milton Miller wrote:
> > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 07:29:58 -0000, Amit Shah wrote:
> > > > hvc_open() can be called without having any backing device. This
> > > > results in a call to hvc_kick() which calls wake_up_process on a NULL
> > > > pointer.
> > >
> > > How is hvc_open called without a hvc_driver registered to the tty layer?
> >
> > This gets reproduced in a couple of scenarios, I'm trying to get more
> > information.
OK - I finally could reproduce myself, albiet it's a panic in
hvc_open, not the one mentioned earlier.
hvc_console is built into the kernel and virtio_console is a module.
This sequence triggers a panic:
- modprobe virtio_console
- agetty /dev/hvc0 9600 vt100
- rmmod virtio_console
- modprobe virtio_console
- agetty /dev/hvc0 9600 vt100
A patch that I had sent previously, to hvc_remove() a port when the
associated virtio_console port gets unplugged, fixes this panic.
Stricter checking in hvc_open(), as you mentioned, will solve the
other one as well.
Thanks!
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-20 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-24 7:29 [PATCH] hvc_console: Don't access hvc_task if not initialised Amit Shah
2011-03-24 14:58 ` Milton Miller
2011-03-25 8:47 ` Amit Shah
2011-03-28 17:52 ` Milton Miller
2011-04-20 12:33 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2011-04-20 14:34 ` Greg KH
2011-04-20 17:06 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-27 5:01 ` Rusty Russell
2011-04-27 6:31 ` Amit Shah
2011-04-28 0:09 ` Greg KH
2011-04-28 4:00 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110420123330.GB3519@amit-x200.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=miltonm@bga.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).