From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:35:42 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Meador Inge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc: document the FSL MPIC message register binding Message-ID: <20110421143542.68971b33@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <4DB084F6.4060103@mentor.com> References: <1303232375-25014-1-git-send-email-meador_inge@mentor.com> <1303232375-25014-2-git-send-email-meador_inge@mentor.com> <20110419125214.560f4b99@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <4DADD3D2.6070805@mentor.com> <20110419133336.46d8566f@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <4DB084F6.4060103@mentor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: openmcapi-dev@googlegroups.com, Hollis Blanchard , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:26:46 -0500 Meador Inge wrote: > Hmmm ... In the MPC8572E and P1022DS manuals I don't see the terminology > group used for message registers. I was looking at the P4080 manual, which does use it. It looks like some other chip manuals just use MSGR0-MSGR7. > If you feel like group is a more idiomatic term, I can change it. Since the docs aren't consistent, I don't really have a strong opinion here. Just make clear in the binding what you're referring to. -Scott