From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Sender: Grant Likely Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:43:55 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] General device tree irq domain infrastructure Message-ID: <20110429174355.GA21098@ponder.secretlab.ca> References: <20110428192227.8979.49181.stgit@ponder> <4DBAE461.7000307@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4DBAE461.7000307@linutronix.de> Cc: Michal Simek , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , hpa@zytor.com, Dirk Brandewie , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 06:16:33PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: > >I'd really like to get patches 1-4 merged into 2.6.40. Please test. > >I'm also running through build testing here, and when it's complete > >I'll push it out to a 'devicetree/irq-domain' branch on > >git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6 > > I pulled this, built and booted my x86-dt box and nothing exploded so far. > > If you merge Linus' tree then you will get a conflict (sooner or later) in > ioapic_of_irq_map() in arch/x86/kernel/devicetree.c: > > - return io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once(*out_hwirq, cpu_to_node(0), &attr); > - if (io_apic_setup_irq_pin(hwirq, cpu_to_node(0), &attr)) > ++ if (io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once(hwirq, cpu_to_node(0), &attr)) > > Sebastian Thanks Sebastian. Unless you say otherwise, I'll take that as an Acked-by. :-) g.