From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <R65073@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:23:25 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] ARM: mxc: remove esdhc.h and use the public one
Message-ID: <20110509062324.GA2577@freescale.com>
References: <1304601778-13837-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
	<1304601778-13837-8-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org>
	<20110506083959.GS11574@pengutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
In-Reply-To: <20110506083959.GS11574@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>, sameo@linux.intel.com,
	Xiaobo Xie <X.Xie@freescale.com>, patches@linaro.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	Saeed Bishara <saeed@marvell.com>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>,
	Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Albert Herranz <albert_herranz@yahoo.es>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@lists.ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

Hi Uwe,

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 10:39:59AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote:
> Hello Shawn,
>=20
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:58PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  .../plat-mxc/devices/platform-sdhci-esdhc-imx.c    |    1 -
> >  arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/devices-common.h    |    2 +-
> what about removing arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/esdhc.h in this
> patch as advertised in the subject?
>=20
Yes, will do if the patch #4 will finally stands.  People are voting
for it.  Let's see Wolfram's position.

--=20
Regards,
Shawn