From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from AM1EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (am1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.global.frontbridge.com", Issuer "Cybertrust SureServer Standard Validation CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AA401007D8 for ; Fri, 13 May 2011 01:32:53 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 10:31:35 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [linuxppc-release] [PATCH 1/2] powerpc, e5500: add networking to defconfig Message-ID: <20110512103135.2c2a037a@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <20110512103108.6dd3ca2a@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> References: <20110510180147.GA18443@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <3F607A5180246847A760FD34122A1E0514EC65@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net> <20110512103108.6dd3ca2a@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: Wood Scott-B07421 , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Li Yang-R58472 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 12 May 2011 10:31:08 -0500 Scott Wood wrote: > On Thu, 12 May 2011 01:11:03 -0500 > Li Yang-R58472 wrote: > > > >diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/e55xx_smp_defconfig > > >b/arch/powerpc/configs/e55xx_smp_defconfig > > >index 9fa1613..f4c5780 100644 > > >--- a/arch/powerpc/configs/e55xx_smp_defconfig > > >+++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/e55xx_smp_defconfig > > >@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2 > > > CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y > > > CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y > > > CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT=y > > >+CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ=y > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > I remember in previous testing that this option has a negative effect on performance. Do we really need it to be enabled? > > I didn't change this setting, it just moved due to running it through > savedefconfig. What was the performance impact? -Scott