From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hw_breakpoint: Let the user choose not to build it (and perf too)
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:27:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110525022723.GE14329@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1306273947-8410-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:52:21PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> Mostly just a rebase against latest upstream
> updates and acks from Will Deacon added In this second version.
>
> Please tell me if you are ok with this set.
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---
>
> Frederic Weisbecker (6):
> hw_breakpoints: Split hardware breakpoints config
> hw_breakpoints: Migrate breakpoint conditional build under new config
> x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints
> hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events
> hw_breakpoints: Only force perf events if breakpoints are selected
> hw_breakpoints: Drop remaining misplaced dependency on perf
>
The series looks good to me:
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-25 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 21:52 [PATCH v2] hw_breakpoint: Let the user choose not to build it (and perf too) Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/6] hw_breakpoints: Split hardware breakpoints config Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/6] hw_breakpoints: Migrate breakpoint conditional build under new config Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 13:27 ` K.Prasad
2011-07-04 13:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 17:44 ` K.Prasad
2011-07-05 13:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: Allow the user not to build hw_breakpoints Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 4/6] hw_breakpoints: Breakpoints arch ability don't need perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-04 13:32 ` K.Prasad
2011-07-04 13:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 5/6] hw_breakpoints: Only force perf events if breakpoints are selected Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-24 21:52 ` [PATCH 6/6] hw_breakpoints: Drop remaining misplaced dependency on perf Frederic Weisbecker
2011-05-25 2:27 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110525022723.GE14329@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).