From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78FEB6FD9 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2011 06:07:51 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 16:07:40 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add cpufreq driver for Momentum Maple boards Message-ID: <20110617200740.GA31457@redhat.com> References: <1308284088.32158.0.camel@pasglop> <1308300556-4463-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <201106171117.14794.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 03:12:56PM +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary? We haven't done it so far for x86 & arm, so for now at least, just keeping them in drivers/cpufreq/ should be sufficient. > Should I resumbit it, or there will be massive arch/powerpc -> > drivers/cpufreq move? Good question. I haven't heard anything from any of the PPC maintainers on this subject, but I'll be happy to help out where I can if they decide to follow suit with x86/arm. Dave