From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:59:46 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] powerpc: add support for MPIC message register API Message-ID: <20110620105946.23708a43@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> In-Reply-To: <1308351533.32158.61.camel@pasglop> References: <1306869543-18812-1-git-send-email-meador_inge@mentor.com> <1306869543-18812-3-git-send-email-meador_inge@mentor.com> <1308288784.32158.30.camel@pasglop> <20110617115828.3cebd5c9@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> <1308351533.32158.61.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Cc: Meador Inge , openmcapi-dev@googlegroups.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Hollis Blanchard , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 08:58:53 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 11:58 -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > When did this change from "considered an internal implementation > > issue, and not really an interface" to "all new interfaces"? > > Interesting blurb... that's not everybody's opinion and I would argue > that supporting AMP kernels isn't something we want to do with closed > source crap. I'm not advocating "closed source crap", just that if something is "policy" (as opposed to opinion), it'd be nice if the documentation actually matched. -Scott