From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65ACB6F57 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 04:30:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:30:03 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: kevin diggs Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add cpufreq driver for Momentum Maple boards Message-ID: <20110630183002.GA9314@redhat.com> References: <1308316207-9075-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1308316207-9075-2-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com> <1309318110.32158.520.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 01:23:03PM -0500, kevin diggs wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > wrote: > > > > drivers/cpufreq/powerpc. However my current version (as suggested by Ben) > > goes directly to drivers/cpufreq > > > Uh ... Just curious ... why is arch specific code now being put > outside of the arch directories? When I wrote the 750GX stuff > (~2.6.28) I put in a location similar to what x86 was doing? When did > this change? last release, ARM moved their cpufreq drivers. I moved the x86 ones afterwards. There's precedent for other arch specific drivers in drivers/ too, but the cpufreq move is a recent thing. Dave