From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu (mx2.mail.elte.hu [157.181.151.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9484B6F5B for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 22:14:27 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:14:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Move definition of MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE to a header Message-ID: <20110701121408.GC28008@elte.hu> References: <1308013070.2874.784.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1308013070.2874.784.camel@pasglop> Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Thomas Gleixner , linuxppc-dev , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , * Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > The macro MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE is currently defined twice in two .c > files, and I need it in a third one to fix a powerpc bug, so let's > first move it into a header > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > --- > > Ingo, Thomas: Who needs to ack the x86 bit ? I'd like to send that > to Linus asap with the powerpc fix. Acked-by: Ingo Molnar (btw., you can consider obvious cleanups as being implicitly acked by me and don't need to block fixes on me.) Thanks, Ingo