From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:42:12 +1000 From: Tony Breeds To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] 4xx: Add check_link to struct ppc4xx_pciex_hwops Message-ID: <20110713004212.GG20597@ozlabs.org> References: <20110701064424.GE13483@ozlabs.org> <20110712174007.GA26664@crust.elkhashab.com> <20110712180404.GC4203@zod.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20110712180404.GC4203@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Cc: Ayman El-Khashab , LinuxPPC-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 02:04:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:40:07PM -0500, Ayman El-Khashab wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: > >> All current pcie controllers unconditionally use SDR to check the link and > >> poll for reset. > > > >I was able to apply this patch and then modify the 460SX to > >work correctly, so I think it is fine. There is only 1 > >comment below. So how does one supply a patch atop another > >patch? > > > >Best, > >Ayman > > > >> +static int __init ppc4xx_pciex_port_reset_sdr(struct ppc4xx_pciex_port *port) > >> +{ > >> + printk(KERN_INFO "PCIE%d: Checking link...\n", > >> + port->index); > > > >Its not a functional problem, but this printk belongs in the > >check link if anywhere rather than the reset. > > I've got this queued in my tree locally. I can make that change before > I push it out. Thanks Josh. I really thought I'd fixed that before posting. Yours Tony