From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.sgi.com [192.48.179.29]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99DBB71E1 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:11:15 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:11:13 -0500 From: Robin Holt To: Marc Kleine-Budde Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] [flexcan/powerpc] Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010) Message-ID: <20110810101113.GN4926@sgi.com> References: <1312945564-6626-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <4E425716.4010104@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4E425716.4010104@pengutronix.de> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, U Bhaskar-B22300 , socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, Robin Holt , PPC list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 08/10/2011 05:05 AM, Robin Holt wrote: > > With all the patches applied, my p1010rdb works for communicating between > > its two can ports and also can communicate with an external PSOC. I have > > done no testing beyond compile testing on an arm system as I have no > > access to an arm based system. > > > > For the first three patches in the series, I believe they are all ready > > for forwarding to David S. Miller for the netdev tree. I think patch > > 4 is ready for submission to the PPC85xx maintainer. Patch 5 changed > > from the previous post by adding a second compatible string for the > > fsl,p1010_flexcan. > > One remark for the subjects. It seems no one is using "[$subsystem]" > anymore, but rather "$subsystem:". I will, one day, get these patches subject lines correct ;) Did you happen to get a chance to test the patches on arm? Thanks, Robin