linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org,
	U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@freescale.com>,
	Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
	PPC list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:30:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110810183016.GY4926@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E42C196.7030708@freescale.com>

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 12:36:22PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 08/10/2011 12:19 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:56:28AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> >> On 08/10/2011 11:27 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> >>> -CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
> >>> -	This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
> >>> -	the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
> >>> -	(driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock. The selected clock
> >>> -	is the one fed to the prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock).
> >>> -	The PRESDIV field of CTRL(control register) controls a prescaler that
> >>> -	generates the Serial Clock (Sclock), whose period defines the
> >>> -	time quantum used to compose the CAN waveform.
> >>> +- compatible : Should be "fsl,flexcan" and optionally
> >>> +               "fsl,flexcan-<processor>"
> >>
> >> fsl,<processor>-flexcan, and it should not be optional, and should come
> >> before "fsl,flexcan".
> >>
> >> Also may want to list fsl,p1010-rdb as a "canonical compatible" for
> >> anything which is backwards compatible with p1010's implementation.
> > 
> > How do I specify 'canonical compatible'?
> 
> Something like:
> 
>   compatible: Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan".
> 
>   An implementation should also claim any of the following compatibles
>   that it is fully backwards compatible with:
> 
>   - fsl,p1010-rdb

I am so confused.  fsl,p1010-flexcan refers, in my mind at least, to
a particular chiplet on the p1010 freescale processor.  fsl,p1010-rdb
would mean nothing to me as that is a p1010 processor with two flexcan
chiplets wired to a pair of DB-9 jacks.  For the driver, what additional
information is being conveyed?

Let's cut to the chase.  Here is what I have after incorporating your
earlier comment about the compatible line.  Please mark this up to
exactly what you are asking for.

Thanks,
Robin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flexcan CAN contoller on Freescale's ARM and PowerPC processors

Required properties:

- compatible : Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan" and "fsl,flexcan"
- reg : Offset and length of the register set for this device
- interrupts : Interrupt tuple for this device

Example:

  can@1c000 {
          compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan";
          reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
          interrupts = <48 0x2>;
          interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
  };

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-10 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-10 16:27 [PATCH v11 0/5] flexcan/powerpc: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010) Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 1/5] flexcan: Remove #include <mach/clock.h> Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 2/5] flexcan: Abstract off read/write for big/little endian Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 3/5] flexcan: Add of_match to platform_device definition Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 4/5] powerpc: Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb Robin Holt
2011-08-10 17:01   ` Kumar Gala
2011-08-10 18:16     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-08-11  3:56       ` Robin Holt
2011-08-11  7:35         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-08-11  4:46       ` Kumar Gala
2011-08-11  7:26         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2011-08-11 10:42         ` Robin Holt
2011-08-11 14:17           ` Kumar Gala
2011-08-10 16:27 ` [PATCH v11 5/5] powerpc: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding Robin Holt
2011-08-10 16:56   ` Scott Wood
2011-08-10 17:19     ` Robin Holt
2011-08-10 17:36       ` Scott Wood
2011-08-10 18:30         ` Robin Holt [this message]
2011-08-10 18:40           ` Scott Wood
2011-08-10 18:45             ` Robin Holt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110810183016.GY4926@sgi.com \
    --to=holt@sgi.com \
    --cc=B22300@freescale.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).