From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5CD1007D3 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:08:48 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:06:40 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: don't use the byte channel handle as a parameter in ehv_bytechan.c Message-ID: <20110922230640.GA16981@kroah.com> References: <1316543217-13769-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1316543217-13769-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-console@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:26:57PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > The ePAPR hypervisor byte channel console driver only supports one byte > channel as a console, and the byte channel handle is stored in a global > variable. It doesn't make any sense to pass that handle as a parameter > to the console functions, since these functions already have access to the > global variable. > > This change also fixes this compilation warning on a 64-bit kernel: > > CC drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.o > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c: In function 'ehv_bc_console_write': > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c:289:24: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c: In function 'ehv_bc_console_init': > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c:355:24: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size > > This warning is because the driver is converting the integer byte channel > handle to/from the void* 'data' field of struct console. Rather than fix > the warning, we just eliminate the code altogether. > > Signed-off-by: Timur Tabi > --- > drivers/tty/ehv_bytechan.c | 7 ++----- This patch doesn't apply at all to my tty tree, what was it made against? confused, greg k-h