From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AAE51007D3 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:28:35 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:28:28 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: don't use the byte channel handle as a parameter in ehv_bytechan.c Message-ID: <20110922232828.GA12088@kroah.com> References: <1316543217-13769-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <20110922230640.GA16981@kroah.com> <4E7BC1A9.5050708@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4E7BC1A9.5050708@freescale.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-console@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:15:53PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > This patch doesn't apply at all to my tty tree, what was it made > > against? > > An internal repository that supposed to be in-sync with the latest and greatest. > > What's the URL for your tty-next repo? There is no public one due to kernel.org being down. Does your patch apply to linux-next?