From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 1wt.eu (1wt.eu [62.212.114.60]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025D2B70B7 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:29:16 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:29:09 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Dan Malek Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] 8xx: Large page(8MB) support for 2.4 Message-ID: <20111010162909.GB21699@1wt.eu> References: <1318246714-5015-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> <39B024CE-70A2-4D32-A29C-5702C7D2D6CF@digitaldans.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <39B024CE-70A2-4D32-A29C-5702C7D2D6CF@digitaldans.com> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi an, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:22:09AM -0700, Dan Malek wrote: > > Hi Joakim. > > On Oct 10, 2011, at 4:38 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > >This adds Large page support for 8xx and uses it > >for all kernel RAM.... > > >- Dan, what do you think :) > > Since you asked, yes it looks great :-) Now, can we > get this into a more contemporary kernel? I'm > actually working on an 8xx project that may have > a few years of life left. At the pace of current 2.4, I'm sure the code won't have change much a few years from now :-) It would be nice to know by now if the current longterm branches work OK or not though. Cheers, Willy