linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@hansjkoch.de>,
	Kai Jiang <Kai.Jiang@freescale.com>,
	gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio: Support 36-bit physical addresses on 32-bit systems
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 22:23:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111012202332.GG21852@local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38B65690-DA92-4923-B2A4-6523DDDA579A@kernel.crashing.org>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:40:22PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Oct 12, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:29PM +0200, Hans J. Koch wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:35:45AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>> From: Kai Jiang <Kai.Jiang@freescale.com>
> >>> 
> >>> To support >32-bit physical addresses for UIO_MEM_PHYS type we need to
> >>> extend the width of 'addr' in struct uio_mem.  Numerous platforms like
> >>> embedded PPC, ARM, and X86 have support for systems with larger physical
> >>> address than logical.
> >>> 
> >>> Since 'addr' may contain a physical, logical, or virtual address the
> >>> easiest solution is to just change the type to 'unsigned long long'
> >>> regardless of which type is utilized.
> >> 
> >> No. There's phys_addr_t for that purpose, defined in include/linux/types.h.
> >> Please use that.
> > 
> > I forgot: If you resend this, please update the documentation as well.
> > (Documentation/DocBook/uio-howto.tmpl)
> 
> What would you look added or modified here?

struct uio_mem ?

Hans

> 
> - k

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-12 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-12 14:35 [PATCH] uio: Support 36-bit physical addresses on 32-bit systems Kumar Gala
2011-10-12 15:32 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-12 16:07   ` Kumar Gala
2011-10-12 16:15     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-13 14:10       ` Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-10-13 14:25         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2011-10-13 14:35           ` Timur Tabi
2011-10-12 16:16     ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-12 16:19   ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-12 18:40     ` Kumar Gala
2011-10-12 20:23       ` Hans J. Koch [this message]
2011-10-12 20:58         ` Kumar Gala
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-10-13 15:50 Kumar Gala
2011-10-14 18:31 ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-14 18:36   ` Greg KH
2011-10-14 18:46     ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-17 16:00   ` Kumar Gala
2011-10-17 17:18     ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-17 18:03       ` Hans J. Koch
2011-10-17 18:23         ` Greg KH
2011-10-17 18:50           ` Hans J. Koch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111012202332.GG21852@local \
    --to=hjk@hansjkoch.de \
    --cc=Kai.Jiang@freescale.com \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).