From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8536DS device trees
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:44:44 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111117204444.GA14736@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1321514181-28897-8-git-send-email-galak@kernel.crashing.org>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:16:00AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Utilize new split between board & SoC, and new SoC device trees split
> into pre & post utilizing 'template' includes for SoC IP blocks.
>
> Other changes include:
> * Moved to specifying interrupt-parent for mpic at root
> * Moved to 4-cell mpic interrupt cells to support MPIC timers
> * Added localbus node, but no chipselect details at this point
> * Reworked PCIe nodes to allow supportin IRQs for controller (errors)
> * and moved
> PCI device IRQs down to virtual bridge level
> * Moved mdio nodes up one level instead of under tsec nodes
> * Added GPIO controller node to MPC8536 SoC template
> [ marked as MPC8572 compatiable to get errata handling that applies ]
> * Added missing cache-line-size & cache-size properties missing from
> L2-cache node
> * Added IP level IEEE 1588 / ptp timer node
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/mpc8536si-post.dtsi | 248 ++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/mpc8536si-pre.dtsi | 63 ++++
OK, so rather than ask again what the real reason for this is, I went
ahead and tried it without the pre/post split.
It seems the issue with putting everything in "pre" is that we can't
rewrite a node name. We can let the board supply its own reg/ranges, but
not the unit address of a previously-defined node.
Putting everything in post works, provided the setting of board-level
compatible is removed from the "si" file. And since the board file is
driving this process, if it really wanted to override something from the
"si" file, it could do so after the include (just as it would currently
need to do to override anything in "post").
-Scott
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-17 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 7:15 [PATCH 01/29] powerpc/85xx: Simplify P1020RDB CAMP dts using includes Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:15 ` [PATCH 02/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework PCI nodes on P1020RDB Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:15 ` [PATCH 03/29] powerpc/85xx: Update SPI binding to match binding spec for P1020RDB Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:15 ` [PATCH 04/29] powerpc/85xx: Update P1020 SEC3.3 node to match actual SoC HW Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:15 ` [PATCH 05/29] powerpc/85xx: Add ethernet magic packet property to P1020 device tree Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:15 ` [PATCH 06/29] powerpc/85xx: p1020si.dtsi update interrupt handling Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:15 ` [PATCH 07/29] powerpc/85xx: create dts components to build up an SoC Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 08/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8536DS device trees Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 09/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8544DS device tree Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 10/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8548CDS device trees Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 11/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8568MDS device tree Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 12/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8569MDS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 13/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework MPC8572DS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 14/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1010RDB and P1010 " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 15/29] powerpc/85xx: Add RTC to P1010RDB " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 16/29] powerpc/85xx: Add crypto engine to P1010 SoC " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 17/29] powerpc/85xx: Add a P1010RDB 36-bit address map " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 18/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1020RDB " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 19/29] powerpc/85xx: Add P1020RDB 36-bit address map " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 20/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1021MDS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 21/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1022DS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 22/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1023RDS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 23/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P2020DS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 24/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P2020RDB " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 25/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P2041RDB " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 26/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P3041DS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 27/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P3060QDS " Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 28/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P4080DS device trees Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 7:16 ` [PATCH 29/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P5020DS device tree Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 14:01 ` [PATCH 21/29] powerpc/85xx: Rework P1022DS " Tabi Timur-B04825
2011-11-17 14:33 ` Kumar Gala
2011-11-17 20:44 ` Scott Wood [this message]
2011-11-20 16:13 ` [PATCH 01/29] powerpc/85xx: Simplify P1020RDB CAMP dts using includes Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111117204444.GA14736@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net \
--to=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).